Questão
de Ética
PT

Simplified version · Volume XII · chapter 5

Differences Between Environmentalism and Consideration for Animals

In plain language, for readers who are new to the topic. About 1 min of reading.

What is this page? A simplified explanation written for this site based on Luciano Carlos Cunha’s text. It leaves out details, examples and sources. For the full argument, read the author’s original text.

The word "environmentalism"

This term is used for very different things. Here, it means the positions that give intrinsic value to things that can't feel, like species, ecosystems, and biodiversity.

The key difference

  • Animal advocacy values each individual that can feel.
  • Environmentalism values species, ecosystems, and certain forms of nature.

That's why the two positions have different goals and often clash.

In practice

Most programs and laws about wild animals have environmental goals. For example:

  • killing animals of "invasive" species;
  • testing on animals to measure pollution;
  • supporting hunting to "control populations."

Other mix-ups

  • Ecological balance and biodiversity aren't the same as animals' well-being. A "balanced" ecosystem can be full of suffering.
  • Ecology is a science; environmentalism is a set of values. Ecology can also be used to help animals.
  • Saying we have to choose between "preserving or destroying nature" is a false choice.

In short

  • Environmentalism values things that can't feel; animal advocacy values those who can.
  • Many environmental programs kill animals.
  • Balance and biodiversity don't guarantee animals' well-being.

Next step

Now you are ready for the full text

The author’s text gives the arguments in detail, with examples, objections and the sources for every claim.

Read the original text