Questão
de Ética
PT

Volume XI · Advanced level

How Do the Various Ethical Theories Approach the Animal Question?

Exploring the relationship between normative ethics and applied ethics

7 chaptersabout 3 hours of reading114 notes103 references

0 of 7 read

About this volume

This book presents an introduction to the main theories of value and normative ethics and to how they apply to our decisions that affect nonhuman animals.

ISBN 978-65-01-72085-2 · 1st edition, September 2025. Original text by Luciano Carlos Cunha, translated into English.

In a nutshell

Utilitarianism, prioritarianism, egalitarianism, Kantianism, contractualism, virtue ethics, ethics of care: what does each theory say about animals? This volume introduces value theory and theories of well-being, and shows that, even though they disagree on foundations, the main theories imply equal consideration.

For kids

Different people explain in different ways why it is wrong to hit someone: because it causes pain, because it breaks a rule, because good people do not do that. This book shows that whichever of these paths you take, you end up concluding that animals matter too.

You will learn

  • The central distinctions of value theory
  • Theories of well-being and where they converge
  • The focal point of the major schools of normative ethics
  • Why so many different theories imply equal consideration

It helps to have read: Volumes I and II. This is the most technical volume.

Chapters

  1. 1
    An Introduction to the Central Distinctions in Value Theory

    Value theory investigates what is good or bad, better or worse; it distinguishes intrinsic value from instrumental value, "better than" from "best of all," and what is good in a certain respect from what is good all things considered.

    20 min
  2. 2
    An Introduction to Theories of Well-Being

    Theories of well-being investigate what makes someone's life go well (experiences, preferences, objective goods, or combinations of these); despite their disagreements, there is a minimal convergence: animals are seriously harmed in the situations they live in.

    26 min
  3. 3
    Assessing How Good/Bad a Situation Containing Several Individuals Is

    Evaluating a situation involving many individuals involves several aspects (total well-being, priority to the worse off, equality, sufficiency, desert), which can be seen as having intrinsic or instrumental value, and which sometimes conflict.

    8 min
  4. 4
    Value Judgments, Descriptions of Facts, Objectivity, and Subjectivity

    Value judgments are not necessarily subjective in the sense of "having no truth": every being who suffers experiences suffering as bad in itself; some things cannot be explained without their value, and we must not confuse value with ethics, or "everyone" with "some people."

    12 min
  5. 5
    Categories of Normative Ethical Theories

    Normative theories fall into consequentialism, deontology, and character-centered ethics, which differ in their focal point (consequences, rules, or character traits); even so, they converge a great deal, including on equal consideration for sentient beings.

    24 min
  6. 6
    To What Extent Do Ethical Theories Agree About What We Owe Animals?

    Utilitarianism, maximin, prioritarianism, egalitarianism, sufficientarianism, their negative versions, pluralist approaches, Kantianism, discourse ethics, contractualism, and character ethics all imply, for different reasons, equal consideration for sentient beings, the rejection of exploitation, and reasons to help wild animals.

    66 min
  7. 7
    Weighing Criteria

    When a situation is good in one respect and bad in another, there are many ways to weigh the criteria: incommensurability, monism, pluralism with equal weights, trumps, fixed or variable weights, maximin, sufficiency, hybrid approaches, indeterminacy, and probabilistic aggregation, each with its own advantages and problems.

    37 min