Volume II

References

Every work cited in “Considering Sentient Beings”, as listed in the original edition. Click a year cited in the text to see the work; here you can see which chapters cite each one.

ABBATE, C. Virtues and Animals: A Minimally Decent Ethic for Practical Living in a Non- Ideal World. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, v. 27, p. 909–929, 2014.
ADAMO, S. A. Do insects feel pain? A question at the intersection of animal behaviour, philosophy and robotics. Animal Behaviour, n. 118, p. 75-79, 2016. Cited in: ch. 13
ADAMS, C.; DONOVAN, J. Beyond Animal Rights: A Feminist Caring Ethic for the Treatment of Animals. New York: Continuum, 1996.
ANIMAL ETHICS. Introduction to wild animal suffering: A guide to the issues. Oakland: Animal Ethics, 2020. Cited in: ch. 5
ANDREWS, K., BIRCH, J., SEBO, J., AND SIMS, T. Background to the New York Declaration on Animal Consciousness. nydeclaration.com, 2024. Cited in: ch. 13
AVRAMIDES, A. Other Minds. London: Routledge, 2001. Cited in: ch. 13
BARRON, A. B. & KLEIN, C. What insects can tell us about the origins of consciousness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, n. 113, p. 4900-4908, 2016. Cited in: ch. 13
BENTHAM, J. Introduction to the principles of moral and legislation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996 [1789]. Cited in: ch. 2, ch. 3
BIRCH, J.; BURN, C.; SCHNELL, A.; BROWNING, H; CRUMP, A. Review of the Evidence of Sentience in Cephalopod Molluscs and Decapod Crustaceans. London: The London School of Economics and Political Science 2021. Cited in: ch. 13
BOXILL, B. R. Equality, discrimination and preferential treatment. In: SINGER, P. (org.) A companion to ethics. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991, p. 333-343.. Cited in: ch. 5
BROOM, D. M. Sentience and animal welfare. Wallingford: CABI, 2014. Cited in: ch. 3, ch. 4
CARRUTHERS, P. Against the moral standing of animals. University of Maryland, 2011. Cited in: ch. 10
CHAN K. M. A. Ethical extensionism under uncertainty of sentience: Duties to non-human organisms without drawing a line. Environmental Values, v. 20, n.3, p. 323–346, 2011. Cited in: ch. 13
CLARK, S. R. L. The Moral Status of Animals. Oxford: Claredon Press, 1977.
COLLETT, M.; COLLETT, T. S. How does the insect central complex use mushroom body output for steering? Current Biology, n. 28, p. R733-R734, 2018. Cited in: ch. 13
CRISP, R. Equality, Priority, and Compassion. Ethics, v. 113, p. 745-763, 2003.
CUNHA, L. C. A igualdade, suas várias interpretações, e a ética interespécies. In: BARBOSA-FOHRMANN, A. P.; LOURENÇO, D. B.; AUBERT, A. C. P. (orgs.). Estudos e direitos dos animais: teorias e desafios. Porto Alegre: Editora Fi, 2022b, p. 104-128. Cited in: ch. 7, ch. 8
CUNHA, L. C. Especismo e priorização de causas. In: ROSARIO, M. C.; PEREIRA, F. S.; AZEVEDO, M. A. O. Anais do Simpósio Ética Animal em Ação. São José dos Campos: Entrementes Editorial, 2023, p. 33-45 Cited in: ch. 8, ch. 10, ch. 12
CUNHA, L. C. Uma breve introdução à ética animal: desde as questões clássicas até o que vem sendo discutido atualmente. Curitiba: Appris, 2021. Cited in: ch. 1, ch. 3, ch. 5, ch. 6, ch. 12
CUNHA, L. C. Razões para ajudar: o sofrimento dos animais selvagens e suas implicações éticas. Curitiba: Appris, 2022a. Cited in: ch. 5, ch. 10, ch. 11
DOMBROWSKI, D. A. Vegetarianism: The Philosophy behind the Ethical Diet. London: Thorsons, 1985.
DUNG, L. Why the Epistemic Objection Against Using Sentience as Criterion of Moral Status is Flawed. Science and Engineering Ethics, n. 28, v. 51, 2022 Cited in: ch. 13
EFSA – EUROPEAN FOOD SAFETY AUTHORITY. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) on a request from the Commission related to the aspects of the biology and welfare of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. EFSA Journal, v. 3, n. 12. Disponível em: https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/2 92. Acesso em 18 out. 2022.
EHNERT, J. The argument from species overlap. Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2002. Cited in: ch. 2
ELWOOD, R. W.; BARR, S.; PATTERSON, L. Pain and stress in crustaceans? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v. 118, p. 128-136, 2009. Cited in: ch. 4
ÉTICA ANIMAL. A importância do futuro. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 24 out. 2018. Cited in: ch. 10
ÉTICA ANIMAL. A situação dos animais na natureza. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 23 out. 2016a. Cited in: ch. 5
ÉTICA ANIMAL. Contratualismo. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 24 dez. 2015g. Cited in: ch. 10, ch. 11, ch. 12
ÉTICA ANIMAL. Critérios para reconhecer a senciência. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 24 out. 2015a. Cited in: ch. 4
ÉTICA ANIMAL. Experimentação em animais. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 26 abr. 2016d. Cited in: ch. 5
ÉTICA ANIMAL. Justiça plena: o que o véu da ignorância nos mostra sobre uma sociedade justa. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 31 dez. 2016f. Cited in: ch. 10, ch. 11, ch. 12
ÉTICA ANIMAL. Quem paga o preço da carne?. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 30 jun. 2021a. Cited in: ch. 5
ÉTICA ANIMAL. O argumento da imparcialidade. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 24 dez. 2015h. Cited in: ch. 10, ch. 11, ch. 12
ÉTICA ANIMAL. O problema da consciência. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 24 out. 2015c. Cited in: ch. 4
ÉTICA ANIMAL. Que seres não são conscientes? Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 19 out. 2015e. Cited in: ch. 4
ÉTICA ANIMAL. Senciência em invertebrados: uma revisão da literatura neurocientífica. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 20 ago. 2019a. Cited in: ch. 3, ch. 4
ÉTICA ANIMAL. Senciência em invertebrados: uma revisão das evidências comportamentais. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 20 jul. 2022b. Cited in: ch. 3, ch. 4
ÉTICA ANIMAL. Teorias éticas e animais não humanos. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 08 dez. 2015f. Cited in: ch. 7
ÉTICA ANIMAL. Uma fisiologia ilustrada do sistema nervoso de invertebrados. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 3 set. 2021d. Cited in: ch. 3, ch. 4
FARIA, C. Equality, priority and nonhuman animals. Dilemata, v. 14, p. 225-236, 2014. Cited in: ch. 8
FEINBERG. J. Doing and deserving. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970. Cited in: ch. 6
FRANCIONE, G. Introduction to animal rights: your child or the dog? Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2000. Cited in: ch. 1
FRANKLIN, J. H. Animal Rights and Moral Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005. Cited in: ch. 1
FRIDJA, N.H. The Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986. Cited in: ch. 3, ch. 4
GOMPERTZ, L. Moral inquiries on the situation of man and of brutes. London: Open Gate, 1997 [1824].
GRONENBERG, W. & LÓPEZ-RIQUELME, G. O. Multisensory convergence in the mushroom bodies of ants and bees. Acta Biologica Hungarica, n. 55, p. 31-37, 2004. Cited in: ch. 13
HARSANYI, J. Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal compa- risons of utility. Journal of Political Economy, v. 63, p. 309-321, 1955. Cited in: ch. 10
HOLTUG, N. Equality for animals. In: RYBERG, J.; PETERSEN, T. S. & WOLF, C.(eds.) New waves in applied ethics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, p. 1-24.
HORTA, O. Debunking the Idyllic View of Natural Processes: Population Dynamics and Suffering in the Wild. Télos, v. 17, p. 73-88, 2010b. Cited in: ch. 10
HORTA, O. Discrimination in terms of moral exclusion. Theoria: Swedish Journal of Philosophy, v. 76, p. 346-364, 2010a. Cited in: ch. 5
HORTA, O. Egalitarianism and animals. Between the species, v. 19, n. 1, p. 109-145, 2016.
HORTA, O. Moral Considerability and the Argument from Relevance. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, v. 31, n. 3, p. 369-388, 2018a. Cited in: ch. 1, ch. 3
HORTA, O. O que é o especismo? Ethic@, v. 21, n. 1, p. 162-193, 2022 [2010]. Cited in: ch. 5
HORTA. O. The Scope of the Argument from Species Overlap. Journal of Applied Philosophy, v. 31, p. 142-154, 2014. Cited in: ch. 2
HORTA, O. Why the Concept of Moral Status Should Be Abandoned. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, v.20, p. 899-910, 2017b. Cited in: ch. 5
HURSTHOUSE, R. Applying Virtue Ethics to Our Treatment of the other Animals. In: WELCHMAN, J. (org.). The Practice of Virtue: Classic and Contemporary Readings in Virtue Ethics. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2006, p. 136–154.
JONES, R. C. The Lobster Considered. In KORB, S; BOLGER, R. K. (orgs.). Gesturing Toward Reality: David Foster Wallace and Philosophy. New York: Bloomsbury. 2014, p. 87– 106. Cited in: ch. 13
KAAS, J. H. (org.). Evolution of nervous systems. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2016. Cited in: ch. 13
KAISER, M. Neuroanatomy: Connectome connects fly and mammalian brain networks. Current Biology, n. 25, p. R416-R418, 2015. Cited in: ch. 13
KANT, I. Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals. London: Hutchinson, 1948 [1785]. Cited in: ch. 1
KAVALIERS, M.; HIRST, M.; TESKY, G. C. A functional role for an opiate system in snail thermal behaviour. Science, v. 220, p. 99-101, 1983. Cited in: ch. 4
KORSGAARD, C. Fellow Creatures: Kantian Ethics and Our Duties to Animals. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, v. 24, p. 77-110, 2005. Cited in: ch. 1
LAW, S. The Philosophy Gym: 25 Short Adventures in Thinking. New York: Thomas Dunne Books, 2003. Cited in: ch. 13
LIPPERT-RASMUSSEN, K. Discrimination. In: RYBERG, J.; PETERSEN, T. S.; WOLF, C. (orgs.). New waves in applied ethics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, p. 51-72. Cited in: ch. 5
LIPPERT-RASMUSSEN, K. Private discrimination: A prioritarian, desert-accommodating account. San Diego Law Review, v. 43, p. 817-856, 2006. Cited in: ch. 5
LOW, P. The Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness. In: PANKSEPP, J.; REISS, D.; EDELMAN, D.; VAN SWINDEREN, B.; LOW, P.; KOCH, C. (orgs.). Francis Crick Memorial Conference on Consciousness in Human and non-Human Animals, 07 jul. 2012. Cited in: ch. 4, ch. 13
MASLIN, K. T. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Polity, 2001. Cited in: ch. 13
MATHENY, G. Utilitarianism and Animals. In: SINGER, P. (org.). In Defense of Animals: The Second Wave. Malden: Blackwell, 2006, p. 13-25.
MATHER, J. A. Animal suffering: An invertebrate perspective. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, v. 4, p. 151-156, 2001. Cited in: ch. 3, ch. 4
MATHER, J. A.; ANDERSON, R. C. Ethics and invertebrates: A cephalopod perspective. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, v. 75, p. 119-129, 2007. Cited in: ch. 3, ch. 4
MENDL, M.; PAUL, E. S.; CHITTKA, L. Animal behaviour: Emotion in invertebrates? Current Biology, n. 21, p. R463-R465, 2011. Cited in: ch. 13
MILLER, H. B. A terminological proposal. Society for the Study of Ethics and Animals Newsletter, v. 30, 2002. Cited in: ch. 2
NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY & SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION. Numbers of insects (species and individuals). Encyclopedia Smithsonian, 2008.
NOBIS, N. Vegetarianism and Virtue: Does Consequentialism Demand Too Little? Social Theory and Practice, v. 28, p. 135–156, 2002.
NUSSBAUM, M. C. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2006.
PARFIT, D. Innumerate Ethics. Philosophy e Public Affairs, v. 7, p. 285-301, 1978. Cited in: ch. 13
PEARCE, D. Can biotechnology abolish suffering? North Carolina: The Neuroethics Foundation, 2017.
PLUHAR, E. Beyond Prejudice: The Moral Significance of Human and Nonhuman Animals. Durham: Duke University Press, 1995.
POLILOV, A. A. The smallest insects evolve anucleate neurons. Arthropod Structure & Development, n. 41, p. 29-34, 2012. Cited in: ch. 13
PORFIRIO. Abstinence from animal food. London: Thomas Taylor, 1823 [ca. 280]. Cited in: ch. 2
RAWLS, J. A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1999 [1971]. Cited in: ch. 10
REGAN, T. The Case for Animal Rights. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1983.
ROLLIN, B. Animal Rights and Human Morality. Buffalo: Prometheus Books, 1981.
ROLLIN, B. The unheeded cry: animal consciousness, animal pain and science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989. Cited in: ch. 4, ch. 9
ROSS, W. D. The right and the good. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930.
ROWLANDS, M. Animal Rights: A Philosophical Defense. London: MacMillan Press, 1998. Cited in: ch. 1
ROWLANDS, M. Animal rights: Moral, theory and practice. 2. ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009 [1998]. Cited in: ch. 10, ch. 11
RYDER, R. D. Animal revolution: Changing attitudes towards speciesism, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2000. p. 217. Cited in: ch. 10
SAPONTZIS, S. F. Morals, Reason and Animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1987.
SEBO, J. J. The Moral Problem of Other Minds. The Harvard Review of Philosophy, v.25, p. 51–70, 23 mai. 2018. Cited in: ch. 13
SHER, G. Desert. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987. Cited in: ch. 6
SHRIVER, A. J. The role of neuroscience in precise, precautionary, and probabilistic accounts of sentience. In: JOHNSON, L. S. M.; FENTON, A; SHRIVER, A (orgs.), Neuroethics and nonhuman animals. New York: Springer, 2020, p. 221–233. Cited in: ch. 13
SINGER, P. Ética Prática. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2002 [1979]. Cited in: ch. 2, ch. 3, ch. 5, ch. 6
SINGER, P. Libertação Animal. Porto Alegre/São Paulo: Lugano, 2004 [1975]. Cited in: ch. 5
SMITH, J. A. A question of pain in invertebrates. ILAR Journal, v. 33, p. 25-31, 1991. Cited in: ch. 3, ch. 4
SNEDDON, L. U. Evolution of nociception in vertebrates: Comparative analysis of lower vertebrates. Brain Research Reviews, v. 46, p. 123-130, 2004. Cited in: ch. 4
TAUREK, J.M. Should the Numbers Count? Philosophy e Public Affairs, v. 6, p. 293-316, 1977. Cited in: ch. 13
TOMASIK, B. How Many Animals are There? Essays on Reducing Suffering, 07 ago. 2019a. Cited in: ch. 10
TOMASIK, B. Why digital sentience is relevant to animal activists. Animal Charity Evaluators. 03 fev. 2015b. Cited in: ch. 4, ch. 5
VANDEVEER, D. Of beasts, persons and the original position. The Monist, v. 62, p. 368- 377, 1979. Cited in: ch. 10
VAN GULICK, R. Consciousness. In: ZALTA, E. N. (org.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2021 Edition. Cited in: ch. 4
VINDING, M. Suffering-focused ethics: Defense and implications, Copenhagen: Ratio Ethica, 2020.
WASSERMAN, D. Discrimination, Concept of. In: CHADWICK, R. (org.) Encyclopedia of applied ethics. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998, p. 805-814. Cited in: ch. 5
WILSON, S. The Species-Norm Account of Human Status. Between the Species, v. 13, n. 5, 2005. Cited in: ch. 2