Volume IX

References

Every work cited in “Ethics and the Future”, as listed in the original edition. Click a year cited in the text to see the work; here you can see which chapters cite each one.

ALTHAUS, D. Descriptive Population Ethics and Its Relevance for Cause Prioritization. Effective Altruism Forum, 04 abr. 2018. Cited in: ch. 6
BAUM, E. T.; MEISTER, A. L. Fecundity of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) from two Maine rivers. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, v. 28, p. 764-767, 1971. Cited in: ch. 3
BAUMANN, T. S-risks: An introduction. Reducing Risks of Future Suffering: Toward a responsible use of new technologies, 2017. Cited in: ch. 1, ch. 12, ch. 13
BAUMANN, T. Avoiding the worst final: how to prevent a moral cathastrophe. Center for Reducing Suffering, 2022. Cited in: ch. 1, ch. 2, ch. 4, ch. 5, ch. 6, ch. 7, ch. 8, ch. 9, ch. 10, ch. 11, ch. 12, ch. 13
BECKSTEAD, N. On the overwhelming importance of shaping the far future. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia). New Brunswick: Rutgers University, 2013. Cited in: ch. 4
BOYLE, P.; RODHOUSE, P. Cephalopods: Ecology and fisheries. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005. Cited in: ch. 3
BRUELAND, H. Highest lifetime fecundity. In: WALKER, T. J. (org.). University of Florida book of insect records. Gainesville: University of Florida, 1995, p. 41-43. Cited in: ch. 3
BURTON, K. NASA Presents Star-Studded Mars Debate. NASA, 25 mar. 2004. Cited in: ch. 1
BUTLIN, P et al. Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness. arXiv: 2308.08708v3 [cs.AI], 22 Aug. 2023 Cited in: ch. 12
COCHRANE, A. Sentientist Politics: A Theory of Global Inter-Species Justice. Oxford University Press, 2018. Cited in: ch. 11
COWEN, T.; PARFIT, D. Against the social discount rate. In: FISHKIN, J.S; LASLETT, P. Justice between age groups and generations. London: Yale University Press, 1992, p. 144- 161. Cited in: ch. 2
CUNHA, L. C. A situação dos insetos: o quão importante é essa questão? Revista de Filosofia Aurora, v. 35, 2023, p. 1-16. Cited in: ch. 1, ch. 9
CUNHA, L. C. Uma breve introdução à ética animal: desde as questões clássicas até o que vem sendo discutido atualmente. Curitiba: Appris, 2021. Cited in: ch. 1
CUNHA, L. C. Razões para ajudar: o sofrimento dos animais selvagens e suas implicações éticas. Curitiba: Appris, 2022. Cited in: ch. 1, ch. 3, ch. 5, ch. 6, ch. 7, ch. 8, ch. 10, ch. 11, ch. 12, ch. 13
CUNHA, L. C. Vítimas da natureza: implicações éticas dos danos que os ani- mais não humanos padecem em decorrência dos processos naturais. 2018. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) – Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, 2018. Cited in: ch. 5
DANIEL, M. S-risks: Why they are the worst existential risks, and how to prevent them. Foundational Research Institute, [s.l.], 2017. Cited in: ch. 1
ÉTICA ANIMAL. A importância do futuro. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 24 out. 2018.
ÉTICA ANIMAL. Animais usados por humanos. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 26 abr. 2016c.
ÉTICA ANIMAL. Biologia do bem-estar. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 8 jul. 2019.
ÉTICA ANIMAL. Dinâmica de populações e o sofrimento dos animais. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 27 out. 2015.
ÉTICA ANIMAL. Éticas focadas no sofrimento. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 10 jun. 2021.
ÉTICA ANIMAL. Introdução ao sofrimento dos animais selvagens. Oakland: Ética Animal, 2023 [2020].
ÉTICA ANIMAL. Justiça plena: o que o véu da ignorância nos mostra sobre uma sociedade justa. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 31 dez. 2016.
ÉTICA ANIMAL. O argumento da imparcialidade. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 24 dez. 2015.
ÉTICA ANIMAL. O potencial da imagem térmica para ajudar os animais: uma revisão da literatura. Oakland: Ética Animal, 2024 [2022].
ÉTICA ANIMAL. O potencial para reduzir o sofrimento dos animais na natureza utilizando amostragem de eDNA. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 21 Set. 2022b.
ÉTICA ANIMAL. O uso de insetos para alimentação. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 21 out. 2021.
ÉTICA ANIMAL. Quais tecnologias podem ser utilizadas para ajudar os animais selvagens? Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 28 Nov. 2022d.
ÉTICA ANIMAL. Raciocínio motivado e viés de confirmação. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 12 mar. 2019.
ÉTICA ANIMAL. Textos sobre a exploração de insetos. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 10 fev. 2022.
ÉTICA ANIMAL. Utilitarismo. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 22 out. 2015.
FARIA, C.; HORTA, O. Welfare biology. In: FISCHER, B. (org.). The routledge handbook Of animal ethics. New York/London: Routledge - Taylor & Francis group, 2020, p. 455-66. Cited in: ch. 9, ch. 13
FRANCIONE, G. L. Animals, property and the Law. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1995. Cited in: ch. 13
FROESE, R.; LUNA, S. No relationship between fecundity and annual reproductive rate in bony fish. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria, v. 34, p. 11-20, 2004. Cited in: ch. 3
GLOOR, L. Tranquilism. Center on Long-Term Risk, 18 Jul. 2017. Cited in: ch. 6
GREAVES, H. & MACASKILL, W. The case for strong longtermism. Global Priorities Institute, v. 7, set. 2019. Cited in: ch. 4
HINCKLEY, S. The reproductive biology of walleye pollock, Theragra chalcogramma, in the Bering Sea, with reference to spawing stock structure. Fishery Bulletin, v. 85, p. 481-498, 1987. Cited in: ch. 3
HORTA, O. A seleção de causas: longoprazismo e animais. Youtube, 27 mar. 2023. Cited in: ch. 9
HORTA, O. Debunking the Idyllic View of Natural Processes: Population Dynamics and Suffering in the Wild. Télos, v. 17, p. 73-88, 2010b. Cited in: ch. 1, ch. 3, ch. 12, ch. 13
HORTA. O que é o especismo? Ethic@, v. 21, n. 1, p. 162-193, 2022. Cited in: ch. 10
KAHNEMAN, D. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 2011. Cited in: ch. 13
KUHN, S. Prisoner’s Dilemma. In: ZALTA, E. N. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2019.
LAW, S. The Philosophy Gym: 25 Short Adventures in Thinking. New York: Thomas Dunne Books, 2003.
MANNINO, A.; ALTHAUS, D.; ERHARDT, J.; GLOOR, L.; HUTTER, A.; METZINGER, T. Artificial intelligence: Opportunities and risks - Policy paper by Effective Altruism Foundation. Effective Altruism Foundation, [s.l.], 2015. Cited in: ch. 1, ch. 12
MEOT-NER, M.; MATLOFF, G. L Directed Panspermia: a Technical and Ethical Evaluation of Seeding the Universe. Journal of the British Interplanetary Society, v. 32, p. 419-23, 1979. Cited in: ch. 1
MOSHAGEN, M., HILBIG, B. E., ZETTLER, I. The dark core of personality. Psychological Review, v. 125, n. 5, p. 656–688, 2018. Cited in: ch. 8
O’BRIEN, G. D. Directed Panspermia, Wild Animal Suffering, and the Ethics of World- Creation. Journal of Applied Philosophy, v. 39, n. 1, 2022. Cited in: ch. 1
O’BRIEN, G. D. The Case for Animal-Inclusive Longtermism. Journal of Moral Philosophy, [s.l.], p. 1–24, 2023.
PARFIT, D. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984. Cited in: ch. 2, ch. 4
PAULHUS, D. L. Toward a taxonomy of dark personalities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, v. 23, n. 6, 421-426, 2014. Cited in: ch. 8
PEARCE, D. Why be Be Negative? The Hedonistic Imperative, 2010. Cited in: ch. 6
RACHELS, J. The End of Life: Euthanasia and Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987. Cited in: ch. 6
RASTOGI, R. K. et al. Ovarian activity and reproduction in the frog, Rana esculenta. Journal of Zoology, v. 200, p. 233-247, 1983.
ROWLANDS, M. Animal rights: Moral, theory and practice. 2. ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009 [1998]. Cited in: ch. 2
SIMLER, K., HANSON, R. The Elephant in the Brain: Hidden Motives in Everyday Life. Oxford University Press, 2017. Cited in: ch. 11
SINGER, P. Ética Prática. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2002 [1993]. Cited in: ch. 3
SORYL, A. A.; MOORE, A. J.; SEDDON, P. J.; KING, M. R. The Case for Welfare Biology. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, v. 34, n. 7, 2021. Cited in: ch. 9, ch. 13
TOMASIK, B. Applied Welfare Biology and Why Wild-Animal Advocates Should Focus on Not Spreading Nature. Essays on Reducing Suffering, 03 jun. 2022. Cited in: ch. 1, ch. 5, ch. 6, ch. 9, ch. 12
TOMASIK, B. How Many Animals are There? Essays on Reducing Suffering, 07 ago. 2019a. Cited in: ch. 1, ch. 10, ch. 12, ch. 13
TOMASIK, B. Omelas and Space Colonization. Essays on Reducing Suffering, 23 mar. 2017. Cited in: ch. 5
TOMASIK, B. Preventing Extreme Suffering Has Moral Priority. Youtube, 13 mar. 2016b. Cited in: ch. 6
TOMASIK, B. Reasons to promote suffering-focused ethics. Essays on Reducing Suffering, 16 abr. 2018 [2015]. Cited in: ch. 6
TOMASIK, B. Risks of astronomical future suffering. Foundational Research Institute, 02 jul. 2019b. Cited in: ch. 1, ch. 4, ch. 8
TOMASIK, B. Why digital sentience is relevant to animal activists. Animal Charity Evaluators. 03 fev. 2015. Cited in: ch. 1, ch. 4, ch. 5, ch. 7, ch. 8, ch. 9, ch. 10, ch. 11, ch. 12
TOMASIK, B. Why Maximize Expected Value? Essays on Reducing Suffering, 07 abr. 2016 [2007]. Cited in: ch. 4
VINDING, M. Reasoned Politics. Copenhagen: Ratio Ethica, 2022. Cited in: ch. 11
VINDING, M. Suffering-focused ethics: Defense and implications, Copenhagen: Ratio Ethica, 2020a. Cited in: ch. 5, ch. 6
VINDING, M. Suffering and happiness: Morally symmetric or orthogonal?, Center for Reducing Suffering, 2020b. Cited in: ch. 6
VIŠAK. T. Killing Happy Animals: Explorations in Utilitarian Ethics. The Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series, 2013.