Volume XII

References

Every work cited in “The Essentials of Animal Ethics”, as listed in the original edition. Click a year cited in the text to see the work; here you can see which chapters cite each one.

BAUMANN, T. S-risks: An introduction. Reducing Risks of Future Suffering: Toward a responsible use of new technologies, 2017. Disponível em: http://s-risks.org/intro/. Acesso em: 15 fev. 2019; Cited in: ch. 11
BAUMANN, T. Avoiding the worst final: how to prevent a moral cathastrophe. Center for Reducing Suffering, 2022. Cited in: ch. 11, ch. 12, ch. 14
BECKSTEAD, N. On the overwhelming importance of shaping the far future. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia). New Brunswick: Rutgers University, 2013. Cited in: ch. 13
BALDNER, K. Realism and Respect. Between the Species, v. 6, n. 1, p. 1-7, 1990. Cited in: ch. 6
BONNARDEL, Y. Contra o apartheid das espécies. Les cahiers antispécistes, v. 14, 1996. Cited in: ch. 6
BOVENKERK, B.; STAFLEU, F.; TRAMPER, R.; VORSTENBOSCH, J.; BROM, F. W. A. To act or not to act? Sheltering animals from the wild: A pluralistic account of a conflict between animal and environmental ethics. Ethics, Place and Environment, v. 6, p. 13-26, 2003. Cited in: ch. 6
BURTON, K. NASA Presents Star-Studded Mars Debate. NASA, 25 mar. 2004. Cited in: ch. 11
CALLICOTT, J. B. Animal Liberation: A Triangular Affair. Environmental Ethics, v. 2, n. 4, p. 311-338, 1980. Cited in: ch. 1, ch. 3, ch. 5, ch. 6
CARRUTHERS, P. The animal issue: Moral theory in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. Cited in: ch. 1
CIGMAN, R. Death, Misfortune and Species Inequality. Philosophy & Public Affairs, v. 10, n. 1, p. 47-64, 1981. Cited in: ch. 4
CLEMENT, G. The Ethic of Care and the Problem of Wild Animals. Between the Species, v. 13, n. 3, 2003. Cited in: ch. 6
COWEN, T. Policing nature. Environmental Ethics, v. 25, p. 169-182, 2003. Cited in: ch. 6
CUNHA, L. C. A igualdade, suas várias interpretações, e a ética interespécies. In: BARBOSA-FOHRMANN, A. P.; LOURENÇO, D. B.; AUBERT, A. C. P. (orgs.). Estudos e direitos dos animais: teorias e desafios. Porto Alegre: Editora Fi, 2022b, p. 104-128. Cited in: ch. 2, ch. 6
CUNHA, L. C. Razões para ajudar: o sofrimento dos animais selvagens e suas implicações éticas. Curitiba: Appris, 2022a.
CUNHA, L. C. Uma breve introdução à ética animal: desde as questões clássicas até o que vem sendo discutido atualmente. Curitiba: Appris, 2021. Cited in: ch. 1, ch. 2, ch. 3, ch. 9
DANIEL, M. S-risks: Why they are the worst existential risks, and how to prevent them. Foundational Research Institute, [s.l.], 2017. Cited in: ch. 11
DICKENS, M. Evaluation frameworks (or: when importance / neglectedness / tractability doesn't apply). Philosophical Multicore, 10 jun. 2016.
DORADO, D. El conflicto entre la ética animal y la ética ambiental: bibliografía analítica. Tese (Doutorado em Biblioteconomia). Madrid: Universidad Carlos III, 2015.
EHNERT, J. The argument from species overlap. Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2002. Cited in: ch. 2
ÉTICA ANIMAL. A importância do futuro. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 24 out. 2018.
ÉTICA ANIMAL. Introdução ao sofrimento dos animais selvagens. Oakland: Ética Animal, 2023 [2020].
ÉTICA ANIMAL. O desenvolvimento da senciência em animais juvenis. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 12 abr. 2022c.
ÉTICA ANIMAL. Senciência em invertebrados: uma revisão da literatura neurocientífica. Ética Animal: ativismo e investigação em defesa dos animais, 20 ago. 2019.
EVERETT, J. Environmental ethics, animal welfarism, and the problem of predation: a Bambi Lover´s respect for nature. Ethics and Environment, v. 6, n. 1, p. 42-67, 2001. Cited in: ch. 6
FARIA, C. Animal Ethics Goes Wild: The Problem of Wild Animal Suffering and Intervention in Nature. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia). Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 2016. Cited in: ch. 6
FARIA, C. Muerte entre las flores: el conflicto entre el ambientalismo y la defensa de los animales no humanos. Viento Sur, v. 125, p. 67-76, 2012. Cited in: ch. 5
FARIA, C.; HORTA, O. Welfare biology. In: FISCHER, B. (org.). The routledge handbook Of animal ethics. New York/London: Routledge - Taylor & Francis group, 2020, p. 455-66. Cited in: ch. 8, ch. 13
FISHCOUNT. Fishcount estimates of numbers of individuals killed in (FAO) reported fishery production. Fishcount: Reducing suffering in fisheries, 2019a. Cited in: ch. 10
FISHCOUNT. Numbers of farmed fish slaughtered each year. Fishcount: Reducing suffering in fisheries, 2019b. Cited in: ch. 10
GREAVES, H. & MACASKILL, W. The case for strong longtermism. Global Priorities Institute, v. 7, set. 2019. Cited in: ch. 13
GREIG, K. Effects of farmed animal advocacy messaging on attitudes towards policies and decisions affecting wild animal suffering. Animal Charity Evaluators, 05 abr. 2017. Cited in: ch. 15
GROFF, Z.; NG, Y. K. Does suffering dominate enjoyment in the animal kingdom? An update to welfare biology. Biology & Philosophy, v. 34, n. 40, p. 1-16, 2019. Cited in: ch. 6
HILLS, A. Utilitarianism, Contractualism and Demandingness. Philosophical Quarterly, [s.l.], v. 60, n. 239, p. 225-242, 2010. Cited in: ch. 6
HORTA, O. Animal Suffering in Nature: The Case for Intervention. Environmental Ethics, n.39, 2017. p .261–79. Cited in: ch. 6
HORTA, O. Debunking the Idyllic View of Natural Processes: Population Dynamics and Suffering in the Wild. Télos, v. 17, p. 73-88, 2010b. Cited in: ch. 6
HORTA, O. Moral Considerability and the Argument from Relevance. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, v. 31, n. 3, p. 369-388, 2018a. Cited in: ch. 2
HORTA. O. The Scope of the Argument from Species Overlap. Journal of Applied Philosophy, v. 31, p. 142-154, 2014. Cited in: ch. 2
HORTA, O. Un desafío para la bioética: la cuestión del especismo. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia). Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 2007. Cited in: ch. 1, ch. 4
JOHANNSEN, K. Wild Animal Ethics: The Moral and Political Problem of Wild Animal Suffering. Abingdon: Routledge, 2020. Cited in: ch. 6
KIRKWOOD, J. K.; SAINSBURY, A. W. Ethics of Interventions for the Welfare of Free-living Wild Animals. Animal Welfare, v. 5, n. 3, p. 235-243, 1996. Cited in: ch. 6
MACHAN, T. Why Humans May Use Animals. Journal of Value Inquiry, v. 36, p. 9-14, 2002. Cited in: ch. 1
MCMAHAN, J. The Moral Problem of Predation. In: CHIGNELL, A.; CUNEO, T.; HALTEMAN, M. C. (org.). Philosophy Comes to Dinner: Arguments About the Ethics of Eating. London: Routledge, 2015. p. 268-294. Cited in: ch. 6
MEOT-NER, M.; MATLOFF, G. L Directed Panspermia: a Technical and Ethical Evaluation of Seeding the Universe. Journal of the British Interplanetary Society, v. 32, p. 419-23, 1979. Cited in: ch. 11
NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY & SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION. Numbers of insects (species and individuals). Encyclopedia Smithsonian, 2008. Cited in: ch. 10
O’BRIEN, G. D. Directed Panspermia, Wild Animal Suffering, and the Ethics of World- Creation. Journal of Applied Philosophy, v. 39, n. 1, 2022. Cited in: ch. 11
OUR WORLD IN DATA. Number of animals slaughtered for meat, World, 1961 to 2018. Our world in data, [s.l.], 2018. Cited in: ch. 10
PARFIT, D. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984. Cited in: ch. 13
RAUKKO, E. The first-ever insect vaccine PrimeBEE helps bees stay healthy. University of Helsinki, 31 out. 2018. Cited in: ch. 7
REESE, J. Summary of Evidence for Foundational Questions in Effective Animal Advocacy. Sentience Institute, 24 dez. 2019. Cited in: ch. 15
RODRIGUES, I. L. A. O sofrimento dos animais selvagens: pensando em soluções. 2025. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) – Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, 2025. Cited in: ch. 16
ROLLIN, B. The unheeded cry: animal consciousness, animal pain and science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989. Cited in: ch. 1
ROLSTON III, H. Respect for life: counting what Singer finds of no account. In: JAMIESON, Dale (org.). Singer and His Critics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 247-268, 1999.
ROWE, A. Insects raised for food and feed — global scale, practices, and policy. Rethink priorities, 29 jun. 2020b. Cited in: ch. 10
ROWE, A. Global cochineal production: scale, welfare concerns, and potential interventions. Effective altruism forum, 11 fev. 2020a. Cited in: ch. 10
ROWE, A. Silk production: global scale and animal welfare issues. Rethink priorities, 19 abr. 2021. Cited in: ch. 10
ROWLANDS, M. Animal rights: Moral, theory and practice. 2. ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009 [1998]. Cited in: ch. 2
SANDERS, B. Global Animal Slaughter Statistics And Charts. Faunalytics, 10 out. 2018. Cited in: ch. 10
SAPONTZIS, S. F. Predation. Ethics and Animals, v. 5, p. 27-38, 1984. Cited in: ch. 1, ch. 6
SAPONZTIS. J. Baird Callicott, 'Animal Liberation: A Triangular Affair' (Review of an Article From Environmental Ethics 4 (1980), Pp. 311-38). Ethics & animals, v. 5, n. 4, p. 113- 121, 1984. Cited in: ch. 3
SCHUKRAFT, J. Managed honey bee welfare: problems and potential interventions. Rethink priorities, 14 nov. 2019.
SCRUTON, R Animal rights and wrongs. London: Metro, 1996. Cited in: ch. 1
SHELTON. J. A. Killing Animals That Don´t Fit In: Moral Dimensions of Habitat Restoration. Between the Species, v. 13, n. 4, 2004. Cited in: ch. 5
ŠIMČIKAS, S. Effective animal advocacy resources. Rethink Priorities, 24 out. 2019.
SIMMONS, A. Animals, Predators, the Right to Life and the Duty to Save Lives. Ethics and the Environment, v. 14, n. 1, p. 15-27, 2009. Cited in: ch. 6
SINGER, P. Ética Prática. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2002 [1993]. Cited in: ch. 2, ch. 3
SINGER, P. The significance of Animal Suffering. In: BAIRD, R. M.; ROSENBAUM, S. E. (orgs.). Animal Experimentation: the Moral Issues. New York: Prometheus Books, 1991, p. 56-66. Cited in: ch. 1
SORYL, A. A.; MOORE, A. J.; SEDDON, P. J.; KING, M. R. The Case for Welfare Biology. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, v. 34, n. 7, 2021. Cited in: ch. 8, ch. 13
TAYLOR, P. Respect for nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986. Cited in: ch. 6
TOMASIK, B. How Many Animals are There? Essays on Reducing Suffering, 07 ago. 2019. Cited in: ch. 6, ch. 10, ch. 11
TOMASIK, B. Risks of astronomical future suffering. Foundational Research Institute, 02 jul. 2019.
TOMASIK, B. The Importance of Wild-Animal Suffering. Relations: Beyond Anthropocentrism, v. 3, n. 2. p. 133-152, 2015a.
TOMASIK, B. Why digital sentience is relevant to animal activists. Animal Charity Evaluators, 03 fev. 2015. Cited in: ch. 6, ch. 11
TORRES ALDAVE, M. The Case for Intervention in Nature on Behalf of Animals. A Critical Review of the Main Arguments against Intervention. Relations: Beyond Anthropocentrism, v. 3, n. 1, p. 33-49, 2015. Cited in: ch. 6
VINDING, M. Reasoned Politics. Copenhagen: Ratio Ethica, 2022. Cited in: ch. 14
WALDHORN, D. AUTRIC, E. Shrimp: The animals most commonly used and killed for food production. Rethink Priorities, 11 ago. 2023. Cited in: ch. 10
ZIMMERMAN, M. E.; CALLICOTT, J. B.; SESSIONS, G.; WARREN, K. J.; CLARK, J. (orgs.). Environmental Philosophy: From Animal Rights to Radical Ecology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1993. Cited in: ch. 5